Editorial

Getting Involved

Why do folks get involved with governing? Often it is personal. They experience firsthand the effect government has on their daily lives. It is a development at Desisto or purchase of land in Interlaken. It is mixed zoning – propane distribution tanks and trucks or a landscaping business’s equipment on a residential block. It is discolored water, the absence of a sewer as the price of septic fields grows exponentially, or a lake that needs weeding and dredging. There is an outcome they dislike, or they fear there will be. They think, “no one is minding the store,” or “the fox is guarding the henhouse” so they run for office, volunteer for a committee, or start attending meetings.

Some folks get involved because they know what should be done. They do not consider other viewpoints. Those who disagree are not neighbors to be worked with; they are the opposition to be defeated.

Some enter governing for fun or fame or power. Some want to be popular.

A precious few enter politics to protect the government and the processes that in turn protect us all. They realize the fragility of what we rely upon.

Whatever the reason, if the process is observed, it all works out. It is a big, brawny system, carefully constructed, that can accommodate all. There is, however, a steep learning curve, and no substitute for learning the rules and the law.

We live in a representative democracy – a Republic – we vote to give away a part of our power to those who are meant to represent us. That is the underpinning, the rest is the dance. The most agile win, and everyone must learn the steps.

In the Reader to Reader section of this issue, more than a dozen letters, written to the Select Board (SB), Community Preservation Commission (CPC), Laurel Hill Association (LHA), and the Stockbridge Land Trust (SLT), are reprinted. All of the letters ask for help with the same problem – the potential development of a 35-acre property in Interlaken. For many this is not an Interlaken concern but a concern about the future of Stockbridge.

Only CPC offered support. The two nonprofits replied in the negative and their well-articulated rationales are also reprinted. The SB stood mute.

To end where this editorial started – I hope that means a lot of people will run for office – join committees – or just start attending meetings.

Carole Owens
Executive Editor

by Carole Owens, Executive Editor

News

SU FYI

1. In a Representative democracy there are always options. When the SB chose not to place the Interlaken property on the agenda, supporters submitted a Citizens petition.
   
   The Citizens’ Petition
   • To see if the Town of Stockbridge will appropriate an amount not to exceed $600,000 from Free Cash for the purpose of exercising its Chapter 61 right to acquire the parcel for sale at 0 Interlaken Cross Rd. as described in the Middle District Berkshire County Registry of Deeds in Book 1347 Page 368
   • What This Petition Is All About
   • The enormous rise in Stockbridge property values creates the margin necessary for profitable development. Any open land in Stockbridge is vulnerable. We must make it harder to develop or lose our open spaces.
   • Ownership is the strongest protection. Stockbridge has the right of first refusal on 35 acres in Interlaken. Do we buy it? Since SB did not place the issue on Town Meeting Warrant, citizens did.
   • A vote the affirmative is necessary at Town. The total amount of money necessary to purchase ($600,000) may be reduced by the following:
   • Private individuals have signaled their willingness to contribute and pledged tens of thousands, CPC has conditionally committed funds, and then perhaps Stockbridge Land Trust and Laurel Hill Association will step up. Every contribution reduces the Town’s obligation.
   • Find out what happened next below at Notes from the SB Meeting April 24, 2025. 
2. Library Services Under Threat Nationwide
   
   Submitted by the Stockbridge Library Association
   • Recent federal decisions have cast serious doubt on the future of library services across the United States – including those provided by the Stockbridge Library, Museum & Archives.
   • On March 14th, 2025, the Trump Administration signed Executive Order 14238, which calls for the reduction of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) to the fullest extent allowed by law. Just over two weeks later, on March 31st, all IMLS staff were placed on administrative leave, effectively halting the agency’s operations.
   • What Is the IMLS and Why It Matters
   • The IMLS is the primary federal agency supporting libraries and museums nationwide. In the last fiscal year, it awarded over $266 million in grants and research support. These funds power vital programs like literacy initiatives, access to digital resources, and cultural preservation efforts.
   • The Impact on Massachusetts Libraries
   • The Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners (MBLC) receives roughly $3.6 million annually through the IMLS’s Grants to States program. This funding supports essential statewide services, including:
   • • Statewide Research Databases: for student and academic research
   • • The Commonwealth Catalog: A critical interlibrary loan system facilitating borrowing across the state.
   • • eBook & digital Audiobook Program: Providing free access to digital collections, including Libby.
   • • Summer Reading Programs: Promoting youth literacy
   • • Free Trainings: For librarians, library staff, and trustees
   • • E-Rate Program: Helping libraries, including the Stockbridge Library, Museum & Archives, cover the cost of internet service and WIFI hardware.
   • The Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners has already instituted cuts to services for Massachusetts library users.
   • Without this support, you’ll likely see fewer available digital titles and longer wait times.
   • Stockbridge Library, Museum & Archives will continue to welcome our visitors and provide collections, programs, and services to library patrons in Stockbridge and across Western Mass.
   • If you have any questions regarding specific library services, please email us at info@stockbridgelibrary.org
   • Here’s How You Can Help:
   • Send a message to your legislators urging them to overturn the executive order and protect IMLS funding.
   • Spread the word: Share information on social media, write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper, and talk about the issue with friends and family. We are grateful for the support of our community and the hard work of library advocates across the state. Thank you for standing with us to protect libraries nationwide, including your own Stockbridge Library, Museum & Archives!

---

News

Notes from the Public Hearing – 35-37 Interlaken Trust, April 17, 2025, Hybrid meeting 

A full house, 57 people in-person and on Zoom, attended the third in a series of public hearings held to consider 35-37 Interlaken Trust development. The single agenda item for this Public Hearing was to discuss the Peer Review.

While the Peer Review is paid for by the applicant, the reviewer is acting in the interest of the Town and the permitting body, in this case, the Select Board.

They review the extent to which a proposed plan adheres to the Town Bylaws, and specifically, the Cottage Era Bylaw and its intent.

Tim Czerwienski, Associate Director of Land Planning for Beals Associates, offered an hour-long explanation of the firm’s April 4, 2025, written report. He said the central point of the Cottage Era bylaw was to preserve and enhance – never detract from – the traditional, historic architecture and grounds.

Czerwienski voiced concern over 40-foot tall buildings when the bylaw has a 35 feet limit. Czerwienski voiced concerns about certain elements being incomplete e.g. elevations for the connections from the secondary buildings to the manor house, and storm water treatment plans, and to determine if the hotel residences actually function as a multifamily residential use that is not allowed in the parcel’s zoning. He also had concerns about the work force housing. Jonathan Silverstein, attorney for35-37 Interlaken Trust responded with remedies as follows:

Original Proposal	Revised Proposal
Hotel residences: 132	133
Hotel suites: 9	6
Single-family homes: 34	23
Workforce housing: 4	4
Parking spaces: 786	565

The Select Board voted to enable the Beals consultant to communicate directly with the developer. Silverstein suggested a schedule to conclude the Hearing as follows: 4/24 applicant responds to Peer Review; 5/1 Next Hearing; 5/15 finalize conditions Public Hearing continued

Notes from special meeting of Community Preservation Committee (CPC), April 22, 2025, Hybrid meeting

Chair Sally Underwood-Miller called the meeting to order and explained 

1. We were holding this special meeting in response to requests from Stockbridge residents who wrote letters expressing concern about the Miles Moffatt property.
   1. Since there was no applicant before the CPC, we could only express opinions and conditional actions. (Conditional on an applicant coming forward).
      
      The Chair went around the room and asked for opinions. She then took a straw pol of the CPC members and found a result in the affirmative, that is, money should be granted in the amount of $100,000 toward purchase of the property. As the Chair explained, if we want to control what is done with property, we have to own it.
      
      The issue writ large is development and over-development in Stockbridge. As the price of Stockbridge real estate rises exponentially, the profit margin increases and attracts developers. The specific issue is a 35-acre property in Interlaken over which the Town has a right of first refusal.
      
      While members of the audience, for example, Steve Shatz, a retired real estate attorney, was displeased that a meeting was even called as he thought it inappropriate, the Chair disagreed and said that it is always appropriate to respond to the concerns of our citizens.

Notes from the Select Board (SB), April 24, Hybrid meeting

The SB approved two one-day liquor licenses Stockbridge Library and Camp Mahkeenac.

Then directional signs installed at the Civil War monument and Gould Meadows were discussed. After an hour, it was decided to postpone the decision for 60 days. The two signs to which folks expressed the most objection will be removed. The Committee (consisting of Barbara Zanetti, Executive Director, Stockbridge Chamber, Jorja Marsden, Finance Committee, and Michael Canales, Town Administrator) will meet and recommend new locations.

Final consideration of the Operating and Capital budgets to be submitted to Town Meeting were discussed. 

• There were no changes to the operating budget and it was approved for submission. 2.
  • The Capital Budget required 3 changes 
    • Chime Tower will need additional funds to remove and repair the copula and treat mold. $200,000 from Free Cash was approved 
    • The stipend of $4000 per Board of Assessors member was removed and now was restored – $12,000. 
    • There was an item not explained about dedicating $50,000 to a retirement fund rather than placing it in then operating budget each year. Although the Town will spend the same amount of money as required doing it this way does not effect the tax rate as operating budget items do. 
  • There were two Citizen Petitions. Canales explained that they were properly drawn and certified so the SB could not prevent them from being placed on the Warrant. The SB could 
    • Determine where on the Warrant to place the petitions. They placed them last (# 17 & 18). Vote was 2:1, Patrick White voted no because items that were apt to generate discussion should be earlier. 
    • Refuse (with respect to the second petition about ground water) to refer it to Planning Board. This would have the effect of “killing the petition” because even if approved by TM – the Mass Attorney General could disallow it for failing to follow proper procedure. (For further explanation see Reader to Reader below: letter from Anita Schwerner and Canales’ response). 

With respect to the other Citizen’s petition re: Miles Moffatt property (exact wording under SU FYI above), Canales read what he called a “memo”. It said. “As to the first petition, the money may be appropriated but it will only be spent if the Select Board votes to exercise the option. Town Meeting (TM) cannot force the Select Board to exercise the option.” No copies were handed out or attached to the SB agenda online. Although, the central function of TM is to approve spending recommended by the SB and CPC, TM is placed in the position of recommending spending to the SB in this case. No information was given about the source of the memo. Although 22 people attended the SB meeting to support the Citizen’s Petition, no discussion was entertained.
Meeting adjourned

---

Contributors

Chesterwood Reopens

By Rebecca Davis, Chesterwood Public Relations

The summer home, studio and gardens of American Renaissance sculptor Daniel Chester French (1850-1931) – will reopen its doors to the public after a multi-faceted, four-year renovation and rehabilitation project to preserve the French family residence. The $4 million project has resulted in three new exhibition rooms, ADA upgrades, and a state-of-the-art collections and resource center available for research and academic work. A site of the National Trust for Historic Preservation since 1969, Chesterwood boasts nine buildings, enveloped in a 122-acre landscape with mountain views, formal gardens and woodland trails forged by French. Daniel Chester French created some of his most iconic work at Chesterwood, notably the seated Abraham Lincoln for the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., dedicated in 1922.

Chesterwood’s 2025 season unveils the fully renovated main residence of Daniel Chester French and his family, designed by American Beaux-Arts architect Henry Bacon and completed in 1901. Although French’s daughter, Margaret French Cresson, made some changes in furnishings and decoration after Chesterwood passed to her ownership, the house is essentially the same as it was when it served as the family’s summer retreat. Patrons will now have access to view the second floor of the residence, which will host three new exhibition rooms, curated with works from Chesterwood’s vast art collection.

“I arrived at Chesterwood at an exciting time following the completion of the beautiful preservation work on the property,” says Miguel Rodriguez, the newly appointed Executive Director of Chesterwood. “I’m thrilled to help bring the site to its full potential through engaging programming and to share Chesterwood’s rich collection—much of which has rarely been seen before.”

Chesterwood displays a collection of French’s original sculpture, plaster maquettes, paintings and furnishings throughout the French family residence, the sculptor’s studio, and exhibition galleries. This summer, three bedrooms on the second floor of the main residence will be opened to the public for an exhibition celebrating the important role of French’s female models and spotlighting the works of two female artists active at Chesterwood: French’s protégée Evelyn Beatrice Longman (1874-1954) and his daughter, Margaret French Cresson (1889-1973).

Modeling Women brings together over 25 sculptures and paintings—many never before exhibited—to explore themes of collaboration and mentorship. The exhibition highlights women who modeled for some of Daniel Chester French’s most celebrated monuments

Summary of the Stockbridge Democratic Town Committee (SDTC) Caucus

By Don Chabon
 

• The caucus was called to order — 34 people attended, 32 Stockbridge Democrats and 2 Others.
• Appreciation for the good attendance was noted, particularly due to conflicts with the proximity to Passover as well as the sudden return of winter weather.
• The first order of business was the Massachusetts Democratic State Convention.
• Stockbridge was allotted three Delegate and three Alternate positions.
• The following were elected to be delegates: David McCarthy, Susan Kreeger and Jamie Minacci. The SDTC Chair will provide them with attendance information.
• It was noted that this will be a platform convention. And as such –
• Our resolutions will be forwarded to be considered for inclusion.
• Opportunities exist for our citizens to participate in the process.
• David McCarthy expressed interest in this
• Info will be provided by the SDTC Chair.
• The second order of business was the Caucus to endorse candidates for town offices as our “Democratic Caucus Nominees.” Ballots were provided and tabulated.
• The following were endorsed:
• Housing Authority – Barney Edmonds
• Parks and Recreation – Linda Barbadoro
• Board of Assessors – Doug Goudey
• Planning Board – Peter Barenski Jr.
• Select Board – Lisa Sauer

In the only contested position (Select Board) Lisa Sauer prevailed over Jamie Minacci. Our thanks to both candidates for engaging in this important exercise of democracy. Noted that no endorsement was made for Board of Health or Sewer and Water Commission. Voice call to write in Alan Wilkin for Sewer and Water, and several votes were written in for him.

Following presentations by the candidates, the caucus was open to general comments, statements of support, questions and discussion. This continued for approximately 45 minutes. Primary subjects included the proposed DeSisto development, taxes, the residential exemption, housing, and environmental impact.

Included in the discussion was a proposed resolution by Charlie Kenny. Justification for that resolution was enumerated. Discussion ensued. A modification of the proposal was suggested and adopted. The final wording is as follows:

Be it resolved that everyone has a right to make their home in a residentially zoned district whose essential character will not be changed by commercial development.

The resolution was seconded and approved by ballot. It will be forwarded to the State Party for consideration of inclusion in the state platform.

In conclusion: I want to thank everyone for attending, for your engaged participation, for your concern for the good of our town and its environment, and your caring about our fellow citizens. We had a good caucus. Thank you.

Save Social Security

By Randy Block, MSW, Chair, National Council of Gray Panthers
 

On April 8th, 21 U.S. Senators sent a letter to Leland Dudek, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Commission, strongly opposing attacks on Social Security (SS) made by the Trump Administration and Elon Musk. Musk, the unelected head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has made cuts including: cutting thousands of workers, closing SSA offices, and limiting phone services that are urgently needed by older and disabled persons who need full access to Social Security offices. Social Security, a government program that issued its first check in 1940, has always sent it payments on time. However, that could change.

Former Social Security officials are warning about delayed Social Security checks and a “Musk Blueprint” to destroy the program from within. Elon Musk – and President Trump – have made false claims that Social Security is a “Ponzi Scheme” and have tried to make the case that the SSA should be cut because there was “waste, fraud and abuse”. This outrageous position is even more troubling because Trump and his MAGA supporters want to privatize Social Security and use the funds to help pay for massive tax cuts to wealthy persons and corporations.

Call your U.S. Senators & U.S. Representatives

202-224-3121 (the Capitol Switchboard)

Tell Them: 1.

1. Restore funding for Social Security staffing 2.
   1. Stop closing Social Security offices 3.
   1. Restore full access to Social Security phone services 4.

Tell your Senators you OPPOSE delays in making SS payment and Don’t use SS funds to pay for massive tax cuts
Together, we can do great things!

---

Events

Events

1. Ventfort Hall Mansion and Gilded Age Museum presents a Mother’s Day Tea on Sunday, May 11, 2025, 1pm. Admission: $50 per person. For more information: contact Linda Rocke, linda@gildedage.org; Chelsea Gaia, Chelsea@gildedage.org
   1. Chesterwood reopens after a four-year renovation project. The 2025 Season features exhibitions, an annual Outdoor Sculpture Show, Performing Arts, and a Speaker Series. From May 14 – October 31, 2025, the 122-acre summer residence, studio and gardens of sculptor Daniel Chester French will be open to visitors. The second floor of French’s renovated residence will feature two female artists active at Chesterwood: Evelyn Beatrice Longman and Margaret French Cresson

From the Desk of Peter Dillon, Superintendent of Superintendent of Schools, Berkshire Hills Regional School District

The Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) Reimbursement Rate for the High School Project Increases from 45.52% to 49.83%, Resulting in $6 Million Dollars off the Local Share

In March 2025, following diligent efforts by the Monument Mountain Regional High School Building Committee and Dr. Peter Dillion, Superintendent of Berkshire Hills Regional School District, MSBA corrected their original reimbursement rate of 45.52% to 49.83%, increasing the state share from $53 million to $59 million, and lowering the local contribution by $6 million, bringing the total local share to $93 million.

The proposed project is a three-story replacement of the existing 1968 building, with an estimated total cost of $154.5 million. This cost includes approximately $59 million from the MSBA and $1.6 million in incentives from MassSave.

Project costs will be finalized after the Schematic Design phase is completed in August 2025. Only at this point will the confirmed tax impact for the district towns be known. A favorable district vote on November 4, 2025 is required to proceed with the funding for design and construction.

If approved, construction will tentatively begin in 2027, with the new building expected to open in the fall of 2029. The new high school will be located on the current site, outside of the existing school’s footprint, allowing for the school to remain fully operational during construction. Additionally, in February 2025, Dr. Dillon announced plans for a fourth Chapter 74 program in Electricity, complementing the existing Automotive, Early Childhood, and Horticulture programs. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics forecasts an 11% growth in the electrical trade between 2023 and 2033, indicating a strong demand for electricians* and appealing career opportunities for students in Berkshire County. An Electricity program would only be made possible by building the new high school.

The Monument Mountain Regional High School Building Committee will host a Community Information Session in the High School Library on June 16, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. A virtual option will be available to attend remotely. During this meeting, updated costs will be presented, an overview of the project will be given, and community members are encouraged to share their comments and ask questions.

For more information and to contact the building committee directly, please visit the project website (https://monumentbuildingproject.org/).

Contact: Peter Dillon, Regional School District, (413) 298-4017 ext. 19, peter.dillon@bhrsd.org

Our Candidates

Submitted by the League of Women Voters

Stockbridge Town Election 2025 Tuesday, May 20, 2025 – 8:00 AM – 6:30 PM

Last Day to Register to Vote – May 9, 2025

Town Meeting – Monday, May 19, 2025 6:30 PM

Stockbridge SAMPLE BALLOT https://www.stockbridge-ma.gov/media/16426

Select Board – 1 seat open for 3 year term – 2 Candidates running

Jamie Minacci Candidate Statement

My first three years on the Stockbridge Select Board have gone quickly. There has been a tremendous amount of time spent learning about governance, the mechanisms of decision making, as well as the content of the various topics, projects and our current legislative decisions. Still, our Select Board has gotten a great deal of work done. In addition, I have chaired the Stockbridge Bowl Stewardship Commission concerned with very important issues such as dredging and controlling Cyanobacteria Blooms. I have served on the Conservation Commission protecting our wetlands. I want to express my appreciation and gratitude for the citizens of the Town of Stockbridge who believed in my ability to roll up my sleeves and work for the residents. It has been an honor and privilege to work with my colleagues on the Select Board and the capable, hard-working Town Hall employees. I look forward to the next three more years to work for our Town on its many ongoing and important projects. I believe my work ethic, dedication and professionalism provide the necessary skills to continue working for our community. I would like to see our projects through to completion and contribute to a stronger future together.

Lisa Sauer Candidate Statement

I moved to the Berkshires from a rural eastern CT town in 1977 to attend a Jr. College located on the campus of one of the former Great Estates in Lenox. I instantly fell in love with the area’s rural character, the scenic beauty, the small-town life and the cultural resources. Stockbridge is unique. The combination of cultural and natural resources and careful planning/zoning have created a community unlike any other. It is the reason people flock here in the summer. My experience includes the following local boards: Lenox Conservation Commission (co-chair), Stockbridge Cultural Council, Stockbridge Planning Board and currently the Stockbridge Historic Preservation Commission, but never Selectboard. Because the buck stops with them, I want to be part of that final decision-making process.

UNCONTESTED RACES

Planning Board

Peter Barenski, Jr. Candidate Statement

I am a candidate for Planning Board. I have lived in Stockbridge my entire life. Stockbridge is a beautiful and wonderful place to live and has long been recognized as a “quintessential rural New England village” surrounded by cultural and artistic offerings. Sustaining this description as a reality within a changing society is a challenge that requires thoughtful planning. Change is a necessary part of sustainability and meeting evolving needs. The town will have to navigate these needs while keeping in touch with its core values. It is my goal as a Planning Board member to work with residents and board members to achieve that balance. I’m committed to doing the necessary research and educating myself on each project brought before the planning board and to work with the goal of the best outcome for the Town of Stockbridge. I would appreciate your vote for Planning Board.

Parks & Recreation

Linda Barbadoro Candidate Statement

I was driving in my car one afternoon, listening to NPR. Basically, the story said in times of political stress and unknowns, it is time for ordinary citizens to step up and be counted. At that moment, the seed was planted. When I was asked if I’d be interested in running, I said ‘Why not’. So here I am, as green as a newby can be. What makes me qualified is that I love recreational activities from volleyball, to taking my grandchildren to our parks and playing Pickleball. It is my opinion that playing sports and engaging in recreational activities as a community makes you stronger as a society and happier as an individual. So I am glad to step up to this opportunity. I will do my part to help Stockbridge maintain its open spaces, provide places for safe community play. This is one way that I can give back to the town I have lived in for 50 years.

Housing Authority – Barney Edmonds

Board of Health – John Loiodice

Board of Assessors – Doug Goudey

Water & Sewer – Peter Socha

Thank you to the League of Women’s Voters for compiling this.

---

Reader to Reader

Dear Carole,

Could you please include the following correction in the next edition of SU. “Jennie Bernard’s name was inadvertently omitted from the list of Stockbridge Cultural Council (SCC) members in the FY 2025 report published in SU April 15, 2025. .Jennie is a Co-Treasurer along with Joan Burkhard.

With thanks,
Anne Ferril, Co-Chair, SCC

Carole,

I’m a bit confused by what took place at Thursday’s Select Board meeting on 4/24. I was on Zoom and I saw that you were there in person. The citizens petitions were not posted online with the other meeting packets and were not included as part of the draft warrant. Neither was the document that Michael Canales read about town meeting approval of expenditures still requiring Select Board approval. Is that a correct understanding of what was said? Did he say where this information can be found? Were printed copies distributed at the meeting so attendees could follow along? Thanks for your help.

Anita Schwerner, Chair Democratic Town Committee
 

Anita,

You are not alone. Several others wrote Stockbridge Updates, the SB, and Town Administrator Michael Canales asking for clarification. Here is Canales’ response.

From: Canales, Michael
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Stockbridge Town Meeting, 4/24/25
Here is the information you requested.

As to the first petition [To see if the Town of Stockbridge will appropriate an amount not to exceed $600,000 from Free Cash for the purpose of exercising its Chapter 61 right to acquire the parcel for sale at 0 Interlaken Cross Rd. as described in the Middle District Berkshire County Registry of Deeds in Book 1347 Page 368] the money may be appropriated but it will only be spent if the Select Board votes to exercise the option. Town Meeting cannot force the Select Board of exercise the option.

As to the second petition, it still needs to go through the 40A:5 process. That is, the Select Board has 14 days from today to refer the proposed amendment to the Planning Board. The Planning Board then must hold a hearing on the proposed amendment within 65 days of the receipt. It must publish notice of the hearing in the newspaper for 2 consecutive weeks. It must also send notice to all necessary parties. Then the PB must either issue a report to Town Meeting with its recommendations or 21 days must have elapsed after the public hearing is closed. If any of these steps are missed, then Town Meeting cannot vote on the amendment. If it does so anyway, the Municipal Law Unit will disapprove the amendment, unless the step missed is limited to notice to abutting communities, BRPC, or EOHLC. There is time to get all this done if both boards act expeditiously.

Anita, I am so sorry it does not answer your questions about posting attachments relevant to the meeting agenda. It does not say where did this information come from. It does not explain why, if the central point of Town Meeting is for voters to authorize expenditures recommended by the SB and CPC, that in this case, the process is upside down and the voters of TM are making a recommendation to the SB. Nor does it explain why if all of a sudden TM can recommend to SB, it cannot recommend to PB, that is, the petition go to TM and then if approved go to PB as a recommendation rather than jumping procedural hoops that are granted 65 days to complete in a bit over 15 days. Perhaps it is hair splitting about authorizing to money but not be allowed to authorize how it is spent? I sincerely hope Canales or Town Counsel follows up and clarifies.

Carole

Honorable Selectboard [Town Counsel and Stockbridge Updates]:

For the last several months the Selectboard has held a hearing regarding the 35-37 Interlaken development proposal by Mr. Patrick Sheehan, a developer who is not a resident of Stockbridge. During this time, Chair Minacci has given Mr. Sheehan’s attorney as much time as he has wanted to present and discuss the proposal, answer questions, and ask questions. The presentation time has totaled several hours. During this same hearing, the Stockbridge residents who have made their homes next to the property have had only two minutes each to speak and little opportunity to ask questions.

The allowed time has totaled a matter of minutes.

We abutters in situations like this have special legal rights. The town must notify us of such a hearing. Abutters have the special legal standing to appeal the Selectboard’s decision in the courts.

As residents, taxpayers, and investors in Stockbridge, we have valuable points of view and contributions to make to the discussion, yet we have not been permitted to do so in an effective way because we, and our attorneys, have not been allowed an appropriate and reasonable time to speak or ask questions.

This procedure has heavily favored the developer by preventing any semblance of a balanced discussion or inquiry into the facts. A hearing is supposed to be just that – an opportunity for the Selectboard to hear the various arguments.

The abutters have legal standing before the Selectboard and if the hearing continues in this manner, the only way we can make our arguments heard is to go to court.

I personally have concerns about the groundwater and possible contamination of my well. No groundwater or aquifer study has been done. The surficial study done already does not define what happens in a karst environment, such as we live in. The safe maximum yield study ordered by the DEP is only half-way completed. Part of that study is designed to determine the influence of groundwater on the reservoir. No study is in place yet to determine the vulnerabilities of the many private wells. Such a major development should not be permitted in a karst environment without proper infrastructure study. The peer review study does not address this issue at all, and stormwater is only part of it.

The abutters and their attorneys should be granted a full and reasonable amount of time to be heard at the next meeting so we can properly express our concerns.

Charles Kenny MD

Dear Carole,

We attended the Select Board meeting on April 17th – the Public Hearing on development plans for 35-37 Interlaken Road (former Desisto School property). We were pleased to see a full room and many attendees on Zoom. We heard a detailed commentary on the Beals Associates Peer Review Report, followed by a presentation by Attorney Jonathan Silverstein representing the property owner, Patrick Sheehan, and his team (SK Design Group). Unfortunately, there was only a brief time for attendees to express their views. We left the meeting worried that if the current plan for this huge hotel/housing development is approved it will have a profoundly negative impact on our town.

We strongly feel that additional meetings are needed so that all Stockbridge residents are made aware of the plans and have an opportunity to express their opinions on the size, scope and appearance of the project. When the Select Board votes, they will then do so truly knowing our community’s views.

When this development project was first proposed, about 9 years ago, we attended one of the small group meetings held on the property to explain the owner’s plans. At that time, we asked if market research had been undertaken to determine whether their concept for a large resort hotel and clustered housing was viable in that location and the answer was “no”. It seems that the thinking is – “if we build it the people will come”. We have many hotels and event spaces in Stockbridge and environs, so the question is – do we need another one and if so, how big should it be? In addition to size, there are other serious concerns to be taken into consideration including increased traffic and congestion on Rt.183 and throughout the town, the impact of years of construction at the site, the potential disruption of aquifers that feed our town reservoir, and the extra burden it places on our police, fire, emergency, water, sewer and transfer station services and resulting financial costs.

The qualities that make Stockbridge so appealing – its quiet neighborhoods, diverse range of housing sizes and styles, its historical significance and the beauty of its landscape – are exactly what make Stockbridge so attractive to residents and visitors. The plans for 35-37 Interlaken Road – essentially a big Cranwell/Miraval-style development – are ill-suited to the neighborhood and our town. A boutique hotel, a restaurant, and some houses would be a perfect fit.

Lenore and Paul Sundberg
 

To the Editor:

Subject: Urgent Safety Concerns on Hawthorne Street

This message addresses a critical safety issue on Hawthorne Street, as reported by numerous road users.

Two main concerns are endangering cyclists and pedestrians: 

1. Narrow, Curvy Roadway Without Clear Markings:
   After crossing the Lenox line into Stockbridge, the road becomes narrow and winding, with virtually no visible shoulder or lane markings. It is a daily occurrence to witness vehicles crossing the center or driving dangerously close to joggers and cyclists—especially when two cars meet in opposite directions.
   1. Broken Asphalt Along the Edge:
      The deteriorating road surface prevents cyclists from staying close to the edge, forcing them into the path of oncoming traffic. This poses a serious risk, particularly on high-traffic days.

A local woman, who regularly uses this road while training for the Josh Billings Run expressed concern after experiencing multiple close calls. Her complaint adds urgency to this matter.

With the arrival of tourist season, traffic increases significantly. Older drivers, in particular, benefit from clear road markings—and it’s worth noting that many new-model vehicles are equipped with lane-detection systems, which rely on visible lines to function properly.

We urge immediate attention to these issues to protect all road users—residents, visitors, and athletes alike.

Thank you for your attention . Kindly let me know of any questions.

Truly, Lionel Delevingne

Letters about the Miles Moffatt Trust Property

To Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust, and the Community Preservation Committee.

As a homeowner and member of the Interlaken/Beachwood Community, I am asking for your help. Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of land worth saving.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Sharon Silow
 

Greetings,

As a homeowner whose family has been part of the Interlaken Community since 1962, I am asking for your help. Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale.

It is not only worth saving because of its beauty: it is an ecosystem that is rich in biodiversity. Its loss would be a threat to all of us.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Diana J. Fox

To the Members of the Stockbridge Select Board,

We, members of the Interlaken neighborhood of Stockbridge, ask that you allow the statute written for Chapter 61, the right of first refusal, to be followed to the letter of the law for the full 120 days. Please do not expedite the decision on the Interlaken Crossroad property owned by the Moffatt Family Trust. There is interest in keeping it as open space and we would like the full time allowed for this process. Should you follow the guidelines provided by law, they would have until June 8 to do their due diligence.

Thank you so much for your attention to our request, Miriam Nunberg
 

To All Parties Concerned,

As a homeowner and member of the Beachwood Community, I am asking for your help. Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of land worth saving.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Alison Rosow
 

To the Members of the Stockbridge Select Board,

As a homeowner and member of the Interlaken Community, I am asking for your help regarding potential development of a 35-acre Interlaken Crossroad property owned by the Moffatt Family Trust in Stockbridge, MA.

As the property is under Chapter 61 status it must be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of and worth saving as open space.

We ask that you allow the statute written for Chapter 61, the right of first refusal, to be followed for the full 120-day review period. Please do not expedite the decision on the Interlaken Crossroad property owned by the Moffatt Family Trust.

Because there is interest in keeping this property as open space we would like the full time allowed for by the Chapter 61 process.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Andrew Eisen

To All Concerne

As a homeowner and member of the IInterlaken Community, I am asking for your help. Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of land worth saving.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely,
Paula and Gary Shalan
 

To the members of the Community Preservation Committee:

As a homeowner and member of the Interlaken Community, I am asking for your help.

Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space.

I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of and worth saving.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Dean Olsher

Dear Members,

As a homeowner and member of the Interlaken Community, I am asking for your help. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee join forces to try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is currently under contract with a developer.

Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of this 35-acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. Further, it is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there which is even more alarming.

As I mentioned, the property is currently under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status, it must be offered under the right of first refusal to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space.

TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE! Please try to find a way to work with the Select Board on this as soon as possible.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025.

Please try to preserve this open space. It is a lovely piece of property in a section of our neighborhood that is so important to us. It’s peaceful, a place where for those of us who live off Route 183 can walk or run safely. We can’t afford to lose any more land to developers. And we should above all else maintain the historical character of our beloved neighborhood.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Kind regards, Leslie Ioffredo

To the Community Preservation Committee,

As a homeowner and member of the Interlaken Community, I am asking for your help. Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of and worth saving.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact.

Our property is next door the proposed development. This destruction of 35 acres of forest will not only compromise our quality of life on a profound level, we are frankly stunned that the Selectboard would consider a proposition that would destroy pristine forest, a habitat for wildlife and the quality of life of residents in the vicinity.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Natasha Hritzuk
 

NOTE to Organizations having an interest in the Moffatt property purchase

I was shocked to learn of the proposed sale of this property to SK Design, with the potential for construction of about 16 housing units. I and my Interlaken neighbors ask for your help in affecting an alternative outcome.

The potential development of this property would drastically and permanently change the character of this historic neighborhood. It is noted as an example of an early industrial village, important to the development of Berkshire County over two centuries ago.

The present potential development would result in increased traffic and noise, degradation of the historic, pastoral and peaceful character of the neighborhood, and the loss of 35 acres of pristine natural habitat.

Interest in finding an alternative solution is growing. It is my hope that key organizations and individuals will work together to preserve the unique character of this beautiful and cherished neighborhood. (I, for one, will step forward to financially support any well reasoned alternative; many others will do so too.)

To our various conservation-related organizations, I say that now is the time for some creative thinking. Collectively, your charters and objectives should demand your close attention to resolving this issue.

A 35-acre development, in Stockbridge in a historic neighborhood? Seriously?

Now is the time for creative and expansive thinking. I hope you will all give this project the attention and involvement it so obviously deserves. Thank you for doing that.

Peter Acly

To the Community Preservation Committee,

As a homeowner and member of the Interlaken Community, I am asking for your help. Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of and worth saving.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact.

Our property is next door the proposed development. This destruction of 35 acres of forest will not only compromise our quality of life on a profound level, we are frankly stunned that the Selectboard would consider a proposition that would destroy pristine forest, a habitat for wildlife and the quality of life of residents in the vicinity.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Grant McCarthy
 

Dear Members of the CPC,

As a homeowner and member of the IInterlaken Community, I am asking for your help. Our historical neighborhood is being threatened by the development of a 35 acre parcel that abuts 7-8 homes and conservation land. It is possible under town bylaws to build up to sixteen houses there. Right now it is under contract with a developer. However, because the property is under Chapter 61 status it has to be offered, under the right of first refusal, to the town or other entities that could buy it for use as open space. I am writing to you requesting that the Laurel Hill Association, Stockbridge Land Trust and the Community Preservation Committee try to save the Moffatt Family Trust property that is for sale. It is a lovely piece of pastoral land and worth saving.

The decision must be made and the contract signed before June 8, 2025. It is not only an important site for the preservation of wildlife habitats but important to keep the historical character of the neighborhood intact. Furthermore, as a result of the closure of the Curtisville Bridge in 2012, traffic and driving on Interlaken Cross Road, Hill Road and Trask Lane have already become challenging as people seek to go between Prospect Hill Road and Rte 183. The noise and disruption that would result from the construction of a housing development, not to mention the increased traffic from the added homes that would be created would be detrimental to the tranquility of our neighborhood.

Thank you so much for your consideration of this important site.

Sincerely, Bruce Auerbach
 

To the Members of the Stockbridge Select Board,

We, members of the Interlaken neighborhood of Stockbridge, ask that you allow the provisions of Chapter 61,including the right of first refusal in connection with the proposed sale of the property, to be followed for the full 120 days. Please do not expedite the decision on the Interlaken Crossroad property owned by the Moffatt Family Trust. There is interest in keeping it as open space and we would like the full time allowed for this interest to be pursued. Should you follow the guidelines provided by law, they would have until June 8 to do their due diligence.

Thank you so much for your attention to our request,

Meryl and Phil Cedar

From the Board of Trustees of the Laurel Hill Association (LHA)

The Laurel Hill Association convened on April 16, 2025, to consider a matter of significant public and institutional interest: the potential exercise of the Town of Stockbridge’s Chapter 61 right of first refusal on the Interlaken Cross Road/Moffatt property. This deliberation followed requests from town officials and several concerned citizens.

Prior to the meeting, LHA board members conducted thorough due diligence to assess the property’s alignment with LHA’s historic mission “to do such things as shall serve to improve the quality of life and of the environment in the town of Stockbridge.” This process included an on-site inspection and consultations with both private and public environmental experts to evaluate the property’s ecological significance and habitat value.

The Properties Committee submitted detailed findings for consideration by the full Board, addressing key criteria such as: (1) whether the property functions as a visual or ecological gateway to the town; (2) its contiguity with existing LHA holdings; (3) the presence of significant wildlife or ecological assets; (4) projected long-term maintenance obligations; and (5) the financial feasibility of acquisition under the Chapter 61 framework, should the Town of Stockbridge assign its right of first refusal to LHA.

After extensive deliberation, the Board concluded that the property does not meet the criteria for LHA acquisition. Specifically, the property is not adjacent to current LHA holdings, lacks notable ecological value, and poses considerable environmental remediation challenges. These include the presence of junk, abandoned vehicles, and a large number of invasive species that would be difficult, if not impossible, and certainly costly to remove. Additionally, the acquisition cost significantly exceeds LHA’s available financial resources. Historically, LHA has acquired 90% of its property through philanthropic donations rather than direct purchases. LHA is committed to protecting open spaces and the character of our historic town. However, we must weigh aesthetic and ecological value against cost to maximize the impact of our limited resources.

While LHA shares the community’s interest in conserving this land, it is not in a financial position to purchase the property outright. However, LHA remains committed to working with the Town of Stockbridge, nonprofit organizations, and private stakeholders. We are open to sharing and leveraging our nonprofit status to support eligible funding opportunities and will actively participate in any collaborative efforts aimed at preserving this land for public benefit.

The Board recognizes the urgency of this matter and reaffirms its dedication to finding cooperative solutions that reflect our shared values and commitment to environmental stewardship.

Sincerely,
The Board of Trustees
Laurel Hill Association*
 

Hilary Deely, President
Robert Sedgwick, Vice-President
Tim O’Brien, Treasurer
Lee Bolman, Secretary

Robert Flower
John Graziano
Ben Nickley
Cheryl Resetarits

* Two Laurel Hill trustees, Kate Fletcher and Lis Wheeler, have been advised by town counsel that, as members of the Planning Board, they could not sign any documents on behalf of LHA and are recused from signature of this document.

The general position of the Stockbridge Land Trust (SLT) is this.

The Land Trust is not in a position to purchase the land. The assessed price is $150,000. As such, we could generally assume the fair market value for the land is between that and $300,000. The current sale price is 4x the assessed value. As a nonprofit, we cannot purchase a property well over the fair market value.

Additionally, the Land Trust has had a general position of not owning land but rather focusing on holding the CR on properties.

In reviewing the land, it is predominantly white pines and so it meets the forestry provision for a CR.

There is a considerable presence of invasives on the property, especially where it abuts conservation land to the west. The Land Trust holds CRs on those Acly properties. Monitoring of those properties has become increasingly challenging due to felled trees due to natural occurrences and the presence of invasive thorned plants.

Other than that, short of a thorough baseline report, it is unclear what other conservation value the property presents. According to our recent CR work, the State has changed the CR template and emphasizes more concrete requirements for CRs.

On the other hand, if this land were bundled with the adjoining Moffatt land, there would be considerable argument for establishing a CR.

It is the position of a number of members on the Land Trust that a modest development similar to another one located on Interlaken Crossroad could be possible with provisions for conservation setbacks to protect the conservation land to the west and the wetlands on the Moffatt property to the east.

In speaking with our colleagues at BNRC and Laurel Hill, it appears they have come to the same general position on a number of items above.

That said, if a number of landowners who abut the property wanted to go in with the Town/CPC to purchase the property and wanted a CR on the land, the Land Trust would be willing to work with you all to make that happen.

If the Town wanted to purchase the land, it certainly can do so and then set it aside as protected/recreation lands similar to Gould Meadows and Bullard Woods which would then come under the purview of the Conservation Commission.Rich Bradway, President, SLT