Introduction

Vote! May 18

Did you know, according to the Town Clerk, there are 1643 registered voters in Stockbridge? 793 are unenrolled (Independents), 703 are Democrats, 135 are Republicans and 12 are from other parties. Did you know, on average, only 417 of us vote?

Did you know fewer vote in an off year such as 2021, that is, a year when there is no national election?

Did you know the number of votes separating the winner and the loser can be fewer than 100?

Did you know every election is important? Every election has issues that matter. Did you know every single vote is significant?

This is a representative democracy, but the only way to have your views represented is to know your candidates, make a choice, and

Thank you for exercising your precious right to

by Carole Owens, Managing Editor

News

Notes from the Stockbridge Bowl Stewardship Committee May 7 via Zoom

Present

• Jamie Minacci, Chair
• Michael Nathan, Stockbridge Bowl Association
• Charles Kenny — Board of Health
• Roxanne McCaffrey — Select Board
• John Loiodice– Sewer & Water Commission
• Mike Buffoni — Water and Sewer Department
• Gary Kleinerman — Stockbridge Harbormaster

Others present named as they speak (could not be seen)

1. Report from Michael Nathan in response to letters from Lake Drive requesting sewer connection, and from folks who live on The Cove requesting dredging beyond the pipes. Wellenkamp reported there was no silt build up in The Cove. Nathan said, “that was absolutely wrong”, and “Wellenkamp does not have final say”. Nathan recalled The Cove was in original dredging plan. He will track down how/why it was removed from this version.
2. Another aspect of the dredging was moving the silt out of the lake (dredging directly to Bullard Woods or to private lake property and then trucked to Bullard Woods.) Of the two plans, the most cost effective will be followed. ZBA (the engineering firm) is getting estimates. The dredging would go on from April to October.
3. Buffoni supported de-silting The Cove, remembered swimming there as a boy, but now growing in (see photo). He was also concerned about impact on Larrywaug Brook and asked if gate in outlet was working. Kleinerman said yes. (Gate controls out-flow of water from lake)
4. Bruce Rubin, a lake resident, was concerned about noise of dredging as lake is “echo chamber”. Peter Strauss, a lake resident, wanted to “hear the concerts from Tanglewood” so was also concerned about noise. Nathan said dredging must be done. If Stockbridge loses the lake, the “loss would be devastating” to the town. He urged long-range planning — the lake could be lost, that is, revert to wetlands.
5. Someone else was concerned about water level, but evidently dredging does not affect water level.
6. Kleinerman had four agenda items:
   1. Increase salary of lake inspectors from $13.50/hr. to $15/hr. and name a manager of inspectors at $20/hr. Reduce the hours from 12 to 10/daily, and thereby, keep the total expenditure the same.
   2. Town contracted with Public Access, and Kleinerman requested they pave parking lot, build floating dock for boat boarding, and look at trees on shoreline. Patrick White said he inspected the tree situation with Minacci. It appears to be serious problem to be evaluated and addressed.
   3. Kleinerman requested that white line on ramp painted so two boats could launch.
   4. Requested port-o-potties installed from Memorial Day to Labor Day
7. Finally, Nathan wanted a full discussion on the agenda with respect to Stockbridge Bowl Stewardship becoming a commission rather than a committee. There was no discussion before adding it to the warrant. In an earlier SB meeting, Chair Minacci mentioned she was not consulted before the warrant item was proposed. Roxanne said committee/commission was “just semantics”.

Meeting adjourned.

Editor’s Note: Apparently there was agreement to discuss the change in Stockbridge Bowl Stewardship from a committee to a commission, but apparently it will occur after the town is asked to vote on the change.

News

Planning Board Consultants

by Patrick White

Last Thursday, the Select Board placed $40,000 for Planning Board consultants on the town warrant by a 2-1 vote. I voted no. Here’s why.

For weeks, I have asked for a prioritized list of future bylaw revisions. We were given a vague presentation, not a prioritized list. How are the voters to know what they are funding?

I also have a problem with process. Our Town Administrator should manage outsourcing decisions, not a volunteer board. He should begin by determining whether we have the skills to address the issue with in-house staff (on salary) or Town Counsel (on retainer). This year, the SB wrote six bylaws this way, costing the taxpayers nothing.

Finally, I have serious concerns regarding the overall direction of these efforts. The NRPZ draft contains language that could be disastrous for every Stockbridge neighborhood. The proposed bylaw would replace the zoning for 2/3s of the town’s land mass.

For example, we already have a cluster bylaw on the books, but it allows the PB to permit a project only if it includes no more homes than would otherwise be allowed in a conventional subdivision. The proposed bylaw includes a provision whereby the PB could increase the unit density, without limit, by waiver (see section 1d).

Keep in mind, we have only had one subdivision in town in the past ten years! Simply put, there is no urgency here. Yet we’ve been fed a misleading narrative that our entire town is at risk, that the bylaws we have are somehow disastrous for conservation and open space. Use your eyes folks, these claims are ridiculous. Embracing by-right development will lead to more development. If that’s what voters want, fine, but let’s have an honest debate free from fear-mongering.

Is the threat imminent? We can easily test the theory: let’s wait to act until we’ve had a couple of “bad” subdivisions. Think of all the real problems we can address while we wait. And wait. And wait.

This should not be construed as anti-development. Informed analysis, good process and sound decisions are essential to a positive outcome.

Folks like Jack Spencer, Mary Flynn and many others wrote our current bylaws over many decades. Our bylaws have been enormously successful at protecting the character of Stockbridge—and the property values we enjoy. Stockbridge’s zoning isn’t broken. It does not need to be fixed.

Patrick White is a member of the Stockbridge Board of Selectmen.

by Patrick White

News

Update from the Fountains Committee

by Member Carl Sprague

With ongoing discussion, planning and funding, renovations to the Town’s two Main Street fountains are underway. The iconic Cat and Dog sculpture has been moved to the Housatonic Studio of Jeffrey Gulick — a highly skilled sculptor and restoration specialist — who fortunately happens to be a local. Jeffrey has worked on projects for the White House, Newport mansions, The Mount and Ventfort Hall. He is in a multi-step process of taking molds from the original sculpture with the goal of creating an historically accurate new casting, which will restore some of the damage the original has suffered over the last 150 years. The original sculpture will of course be preserved — possibly at Town Hall. Besides replicating the statue, the basin will need work so that it does not leak. One aim is to raise the water level in the basin, as shown in historic photos. The marble coping stones around the edge of the basin are in good shape and only need to be reset.

The watering trough at the intersection of Main and Elm will be cleaned, and cracks patched to make it watertight. Restoration of the plantings is planned. That fountain was the 1881 gift of Signor Albinola, an Italian refugee from Austrian prisons, who loved the peace and hospitality he found in Stockbridge.

The Cat and Dog fountain was also the gift of a Stockbridge newcomer, summer resident John H. Gourlie, one time president of the New York Stock Exchange, who gave the Town the fountain in 1862. He described Stockbridge, “It is as pretty a village as you ever saw.” The Gourlie house was originally opposite the Red Lion Inn and the fountain was part of its garden. Their house was later moved to East Main Street and is now being restored.

In the course of pulling the molds for the new reproduction, Jeffrey Gulick has noted that the dog is male, the cat is female, and that she has just caught a rat, which may be the reason for their altercation. The sculpture is believed to be Italian, but the name of the artist has been lost. The possibility has been raised that it might be the work of Emma Stebbins, who worked in Rome and later settled in Lenox. Any clues?

by Member Carl Sprague

News

Notes from the Planning Board Meeting May 4 via Zoom

Present:

• William Vogt, Chair
• Marie Raftery
• Christine Rasmussen
• Katherine Fletcher
• Nancy Socha
• Wayne Slosek
• Gary Pitney
• Jennifer Carmichael, secretary

Others present named as they speak.

The joint meeting closed and PB continued with a Public Hearing to address three proposed bylaw changes — parking, signs, and driveways. Public Hearing required prior to submitting to SB for placement on warrant.

1. Off-street parking. PB remarks – Apparently, no one can comply; SB does not agree as rewritten by consultant, but apparently no action to incorporate SB suggestion. Fletcher concerned that if there is no requirement that the Red Lion and Michael’s both maintain off-street parking that their current lots could be used as building lots. No public comment. Vote to approve sending to SB as written: 5 aye and 2 nay.
2. Signs.
   1. SB recommendation was read into record. SB appeared to recommend that the permitting authority remain with the SB and not be transferred to the PB. One PB member [hard to see] suggested it did not mean what it said. That in fact, while SB said all permitting authority re: signs remain with SB, it only meant permitting authority for temporary signs.
   2. Two 2×2 signs are allowed “By Right” in residential zone. An additional 4×4 sign could be granted by special permit.
   3. Fletcher: that size excessive in residential district? If it remains possible by special permit, “what authority does PB have to turn it down?” No one knew; not even consultant.
   4. Chair — can this bylaw be forwarded to SB subject to more information? Many suggestions made: it could be revised, if not before warrant is printed, then by a handout at Town Meeting, or even from the floor. Finally sent to SB subject to clarification. Was a vote taken?
3. Driveways approved unanimously if word “new” added, that is, proposed bylaw only applies to new driveways not existing.
4. Kevin Lilley for Camp Mahkeenac requested special permit for two new signs; one at Oak Street and one at the Main Entrance. Oak Street sign approved as a directional sign allowed by current bylaw. Sign at main entrance approved on condition that the same size and shape sign used; as if just changed wording on old sign.

News

Notes from the Joint Select Board Meeting Planning Board Meeting: May 4 via Zoom

Present:

• SB Patrick White and Roxanne McCaffrey

PB Members

• William Vogt, Chair
• Marie Raftery
• Christine Rasmussen
• Katherine Fletcher
• Nancy Socha
• Wayne Slosek
• Jennifer Carmichael, secretary
• Michael Canales, Town Administrator

In addition: candidates Carl Sprague and Mark Mills; if others present, could not be seen

1. Christine Rasmussen not present. Although others suggested they could begin the discussion and Rasmussen could join in when she arrived, Chair Vogt insisted upon waiting for Rasmussen.
2. As SB members waited, the PB entertained a Special Permit for 46 Lake Drive, a nonconforming lot. The request was to build a screened porch. The removal of a deck and patio and building of porch would create “less impervious surface” than currently. The special permit was granted.
3. Rasmussen arrived, Chair turned meeting over to her and she presented a power point. Chair asked attendees to hold questions/comments until the end of presentation.
4. A question was asked about the number of slides (answer 24) followed by a reminder that this was scheduled as a discussion not a presentation.
5. After presentation, Chair directed that SB could speak first, then PB members, then public.
6. Select Board member Roxanne McCaffrey asked how much of $40,000 previously allocated was spent to date. Answer: $11,832.
7. Question: can the remaining balance be carried over to next year? Answer, yes. Suggestion: amend request to appear on warrant from $40,000 to the net of $40,000 less unexpended amount at time warrant goes to press.
8. Patrick White, responding to one slide in Rasmussen presentation, commented that 2- and 4-acre zoning “is not antithetical to preservation or rural character.” He added that the proposed NRPZ bylaw — applying to parcels of 20-acres and more — is “breathtaking in scope”. It would affect approximately 9,000 acres of the total acreage of Stockbridge. That is, in round numbers, 9,000/15,000 or 3/5 of total acreage in Stockbridge.
9. White was skeptical that that was “reasonable growth” and asked Vogt to define the term. Vogt said, “I ran on that, but I am not going to discuss that here.”
10. PB member Kate Fletcher mentioned that the PB did not have a mandate to work on open space residential or a bylaw for the whole town. The mandate was to address the Cottage Era Bylaw.
11. There was a comment that after the subcommittee working with the consultants was deemed out of compliance with the Open Meeting Law, PB appointed one person to work with consultants. Question: might that be “doubling down” rather than complying?
12. Question: when did the percentages change? [The percentage of acres to be preserved as part of NRPZ changed from 80% to 50%] Was that change made in a private meeting w/consultant? There were no answers to either question.
13. White said, “If you want my support, you will have to be transparent.”
14. More questions: SB suggested 6 bylaws without a consultant; why does PB need a consultant?
15. Select board member McCaffrey asked to poll PB members — why they want the consultant. Five answers: Rafferty: “we don’t have the expertise”; Socha “agree with Marie”; Pitney “disagree with most of presentation especially abandoning CCE and focusing on NRPZ. Two- and four-acre zoning did a wonderful job of protecting and maintaining the character of Stockbridge”; Slosek “although appreciate expertise, agree with Gary”; Fletcher “town has town counsel and Town Administrator who can assist in doing the job. I do not agree we need $40,000 [for consultants].”
16. Fletcher continued — three-hour meetings unnecessary, the actual work of the PB is being ignored, and “our current bylaws are fine including 2-and-4-acre zoning”. Repeated “do not support $40,000”.
17. White suggested a bylaw committee — “the broad changes being suggested need broad input and coordination. Not a PB project.”
18. There was a motion to continue with consultants: 5 aye and 2 (Pitney and Fletcher) nay.
19. The meeting devolved when the Chair said things such as: “I don’t have to answer your emails.”; “No you may not speak”; “I am running this meeting”. When commented that the Chair was not allowing discussion, Chair adjourned joint meeting.

Editor’s note: On March 6, 2017 a joint meeting between the two boards took place (available to watch on CTSB.org). Briefly, the agenda was the same, but the process and tone were different. In 2021 the PB requested SB place $40,000 for consultants on warrant. SB asked for a joint meeting to understand the amount and purpose. In 2017, the PB wished to take on a task that might require a consultant, therefore, PB Chair Gary Pitney asked for the meeting as a “Courtesy Call” to give the SB a “heads up”. In 2017 the purpose was made clear in an open discussion with questions and answers. It was an easy back and forth with ideas shared. It lasted less than 30 minutes and was congenial gavel to gavel. See the editorial – “Once there was a Stockbridge way” – in the June 1 issue of SU.

Interesting to note that in the vote for/against continuing with consultants, the two opposed have the most education (Fletcher holds a Master’s Degree in planning from UMass) and the most experience (Pitney has served on PB for 15 years).

News

Notes from the Select Board Meeting: April 15 via Zoom

Present:

• Chuck Cardillo, Chair
• Patrick White
• Roxanne McCaffrey
• Michael Canales, Town Administrator

In addition: Others may have been present but could not be seen.

1. Patrick White read a proclamation signed by SB Chair Cardillo in celebration of the 100th birthday of Stockbridge resident David Resnick born April 17, 1921.
2. Minutes from March 25th and April 1 meetings accepted.
3. Early in-person voting May 8 from 9am – 1pm
4. Michael Canales reported the following:
   1. Schedule for the Averic Bridge demolition and reconstruction: August and September; reopening October 2021
   2. Larrywaug Bridge anticipated completion October 31, 2021
   3. Curtisville Bridge — moving of utilities completed. Next step to determine what to do with bridge. One suggestion was to replace it with a modular bridge — deemed a quick and efficient but a temporary solution.
   4. All that remains to complete the Highway Garage is the “punch list”
   5. Swap Shop to reopen — repair step and address handicapped accessibility.
   6. Stockbridge has a vehicle for seniors and those with disabilities. Canales suggested we join the regional program and lend the use of our vehicle. Roundtrip fares will average $10-15, spouses and companions ride for free.
   7. Forestry Grant to facilitate treating trees (Hemlock, Ash and Aspen) in Ice Glen. White explained this grant ($1000) is focused on making Stockbridge eligible for a more significant Forestry Planning Grant. White was informing SB of this as good first step. McCaffrey thought it too early in the process.
   8. Building toward a Town Meeting warrant, Canales presented the following warrant items that involved spending. They were:
      1. $40,000 for Planning Board professional
      2. $50,000 for funding OPEB (Other Post-Employment Benefits)
      3. $35,000 for Rest of the River legal expenses
      4. $35,000 for water testing in Stockbridge Bowl
      5. $ 8000 for Regional School district study
      6. $95,000 to resurface all four tennis courts and basketball court
      7. $15,000 for street light consultant
      8. $12,000 for Underground camera for pump station
      9. $ 3690 for water storage
      10. $ 30000 for Ice Glen
      11. There was “cleanup” item from last fiscal year — Canales explained $97,717 debt service was spent last year but not approved. For this year, $96,918 in debt service. Both have to appear on warrant for approval.

Discussion by SB members

• Before placing the $40,000 for PB consultants on warrant, White requested a joint PB/SB meeting to learn of the $40,000 granted last year how much was spent and on what. What PB anticipates spending an additional $40,000 on?
• PB Chair Vogt was present and said he estimates about 50% of the $25,000 requested for Phil Arnold, Planning Consultant, was spent. Of $15,000 for Jeff Lacy, Vogt unsure how much was spent. PB member Rasmussen, also present, said that one item for which additional funds are needed is review of all Stockbridge bylaws and compliance with State bylaws.
• However, according to White, current Stockbridge bylaws were reviewed by Joel Russell, a previous consultant, Michael Canales, and Donna Brewer, Town Counsel and found to be in good order.
• McCaffrey agreed PB should come up with list of needs for additional funds. Cardillo said such joint meetings might occur periodically for better coordination and updating the public more often on big issues. Both members mentioned the proposal to switch permitting authority from SB to PB as an item to be discussed. The joint meeting was agreed upon.
• White made a correction to the Community Preservation Committee awards. CPC did not approve funding for $15,000 to repair/replace roof at 17 Willard Road.
• With that correction, all “money” items were placed on the warrant by SB except for the $40,000 for PB pending joint meeting.
• To discuss at next meeting: $600,000 to repair Children’s Chime Tower; $960,000 to reconfigure “Red Lion” intersection; $145,000 for town trucks/plows; restructuring debt to make it a consistent figure and constant item on warrant vs. paying cash from funds put aside.
• White mentioned he wants SB to have the capacity to spend money for the benefit of town put aside. “As a general rule, I do not want to be a bank account for the taxpayers.”
• Meeting adjourned

News

Notes from Sewer and Water Commission May 4 via Zoom

Present:

• Donald Schneyer, Chairman
• John Loiodice
• Peter J. Socha
• Jennifer Carmichael, Secretary

Also present: Michael Buffoni, Water Superintendent and Tony Campetti, Sewer Superintendent

Chair: “Kudos to Peter Socha for work on the Town Report. Thank you to Stockbridge Updates for Rick Wilcox’ “piece on history of our sewers — interesting to read.”

1. The relocation of the Curtisville sewer complete. Still to do — complete cleanup, repave, replace and tie in fence to discourage any walkers across bridge.
2. Larrywaug Bridge — Dig Safe completed and gone on May 4th; anticipate work completed by October 31. If not complete, Maximillian pays $1000/day according to the contract.
3. Mike Buffoni will be making Robo-calls to inform Stockbridge residents when he will be doing his annual hydrant flushing.
4. Tony Campetti gave an overview of the monitoring requirements and reporting limits of our plant. He reported everything looks fine and will remain the same “which is positive”.
5. Pump Station status — motion to place on warrant. The money for the pump station will be in the form of a loan to take advantage of low interest rates. The 20-year note will be repaid interest only until 2025 and then principal and interest. Motion passed.
6. Loiodice reported on Stockbridge Bowl Stewardship Committee (SBSC): the dredging plan, the harvesting plan, and the request for Lake Drive to be connected to the sewer. (For details see Notes from SBSC)
7. Glendale Pump Station. There were complaints about an odor. The “drum scrubber” appears to have solved odor problem and now there is the problem of the noise from drum scrubber. While there is no such thing as a silent motor, several suggestions were made to muffle the sound “to try and keep everyone happy.”
8. All in the Sewer, Water and Highway Departments have been vaccinated.
9. The “cut” of wood around reservoir going forward. The Ash and Popular trees are dying, and trees cut down will be distributed for firewood.

The meeting was adjourned.

News

Openings, Closings, and Events Around Town

1. One Tent Popup Fair: Saturday, June 12, 11:00 am to 1:00 pm. The Service League of the Stockbridge First Congregational Church will hold a small Popup Fair in front of the Stockbridge Library, weather permitting. We will be offering home baked goods, jams and jellies and kitchen crafts. Come see what we have been up to the past few months.
2. Berkshire Botanical Garden. The exhibition called “Flights of Fancy” featuring jewelry designed by Mindy Lam opens in the Leonhardt Galleries in Center House through June 6. Brooches on exhibit are available for purchase. Proceeds benefit BBG.
3. Covid vaccinations open to all over 18 years old. FDA is expected to approve 12 years and up.
4. Tanglewood Season 2021 — July 9 – August 16. Favorites Yo-Yo Ma, John Williams, and the Boston Pops will perform. There will be a focus on Beethoven. Tickets will go on sale to the general public beginning at 10 a.m. Monday, May 17 at www.tanglewood.org and 888-266-1200.
5. Looking Back with Warm Regards from Laurie Norton Moffatt

Stockbridge Neighbors, what a year this has been! I hope you and your loved ones have fared well. I’m happy to give you a Spring update on the museum. Also go to Youtube.

Norman Rockwell Museum closed last March 2020 at the beginning of the pandemic but continued to serve our community online with the Virtual Museum. Board and staff felt that it was critical to do our part to support the community — particularly students and teachers learning in new ways, and to connect isolated friends through engaging online programs. All through the spring, summer, and long winter, inspiring and informative artist talks, discussions, and close-looking at art were available to everyone at the Museum’s website.

When we were able to re-open last July, with very low levels of visitors permitted, we opened the doors, our arms, and our hearts to first responders who were admitted free, and instituted a “Pay What You Will” option so that all who were coping with difficult or changed circumstances could experience the joy and uplifting feeling of looking at inspiring art. We were so happy to welcome many of you to the galleries, masked and safely distanced. I am pleased to report that everyone, visitors and staff, have been healthy all these months. It has been a true community effort of love and respect.

We thank you, our treasured Stockbridge friends, here in Norman Rockwell’s hometown, for your support. We anticipate the full re-opening of visitation that seems likely to occur over the summer. Our thanks and sincere gratitude for your friendship and community spirit. We look forward to welcoming you to the galleries!

6. The Erikson Institute of the Austen Riggs Center presents two VIRTUAL events:

a. GRAND ROUNDS

Dynamics of Race, Culture, and Sociopolitical Context in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy
Presenter: Usha Tummala-Narra, PhD
Date: Friday, May 21, 2021
Time: 12:50-1:50 p.m. (Eastern Time)
Registration and details: www.austenriggs.org/GR-UshaTummala-Narra

b. GRAND ROUNDS

Resilience and Risk During COVID-19: Psychoanalytic and Empirical Perspectives
Presenter: Katie C. Lewis, PhD
Date: Friday, June 18, 2021
Time: 12:50-1:50 p.m. (Eastern Time)
Registration and details: www.austenriggs.org/GR-KatieLewis
Grand Rounds are offered free of charge and provide 1.0 continuing education credit.

News

Candidates Q & A

Following is a repeat of all answers from candidates in contested races.

Gary Johnston, Town Moderator, Incumbent

Hi Carole,

Answer to question #1: I have been honored to have been elected to the post of Moderator for over 40 years. My wish to help the town while also running my own business and being involved in many other community activities left me with limited time to do so. My knowledge of parliamentary rules made the Moderators position the logical choice for me.

Answer to question #2: I always strive to conduct my duties as Moderator in a fair and efficient manner to ensure each voter has an opportunity to express their viewpoints, while also following proper procedures and getting the business of the town completed in an expeditious manner. I will continue to do so if I am elected.

Answer to question #3: I wish to thank the voters for supporting me for these many years. I hope that support will continue as long as you feel that I am competent to perform the duties of Moderator.

Sincerely, Gary

Jamie Minacci, Moderator

Hi Carole,

The three questions you posed to us:

A. I feel drawn to run, to end the 43-year term the current position has maintained. I would like to rejuvenate and bring new life to the position of moderator. That All position(s) have term limits….

B. My primary focus will and is to bring equalitarianism to our Town Meetings proceedings. That everyone has an equal opportunity to speak and to vote. To provide each person safety, respect and time to ask questions, to be heard.

C. I would like the citizens to know that I believe civic engagement is essential and necessary, and everyone’s voice needs to be protected and heard. That every citizen’s vote is equal no matter their income, address, education, or age.

Ernest (Chuck) Cardillo Select Board, Incumbent

Carole,

I thought it over for a while. I decided to run for a few reasons. We have a good board and we are getting things done like the highway garage, bridges, bylaws and the everyday operations of the town. I have a very good working relationship with the office employees.

Here are a few of the items on my agenda:

I want to work along with the parks department to bring our playgrounds up to date with more options for different age groups. Hoping this will attract and bring more families into town.

I would like to continue to work on the bylaws and finish the projects that we are working on.

We need to make sure our older population can afford to stay in town. This will take a lot of effort from the select-board and planning board working together.

I want to thank the residents of Stockbridge for their support of me as selectmen. I always try to keep the voters involved in the decisions that we are making. I value their opinions

I have made a few mistakes during my two terms as selectmen. I have learned from those and I feel it made me a more effective and passionate selectmen.

I would like to have the opportunity to serve the town as selectmen again. Chuck

Don Chabon Select Board

What prompted you to run?

These have been seminal, transitional, trying times everywhere and for everyone. Stockbridge like many communities has faced, and will be facing, multiple complex changes and challenges. We need Selectmen who can deal with that.

What is your prime focus?

Many subjects need our focus and Select Board members must be able to multi-task. Currently, 33 items are on my watch list and I’ve compiled them with perspective, explanation and discussion for review on a Web Page: donforstockbridge.godaddysites.com. Let’s talk specifics – check-out the web page: agree/disagree and comment to me at [deleted] Let’s see what can be worked out. I continue to value the opinions of all our citizens, and actively solicit your input.

What would you like to say to voters?

Vote … Don

Gary Pitney, Planning Board, incumbent

Why are you running?

To Serve. To give back to the Town that has given me so much. It is very rewarding to be a part of our community at the governmental level.

Prime Focus:

My prime focus is and always has been to be accessible, approachable, and fair. Make it easier for our community to feel comfortable asking questions and participating in our Town Government. We should all be on a level playing field with a common goal.

What would I like to say?

We have a great Town. It is a wonderful and precious place to live. This requires constant vigilance and care by everyone. We need to manage and care for our Town like the rare Gem that it is. Handle with Care…Be Kind…Be Thoughtful.

Carl Sprague, Planning Board

What prompted you to run?

As a lifelong resident of Stockbridge, I’ve always been interested in what makes the Town work — from our amazing Town Meetings to the constellation of individuals and officials who have made Stockbridge interesting and kept it beautiful through the years. I’ve tried to make my own contribution through the years — serving on the Land Trust, creating and chairing the Historic Preservation Commission, working with Laurel Hill, the Fountain Committee, the Mahkeenac Boating Club, and the Vestry of St. Paul’s Church. I recently spent several years working on our instructive Zoning Bylaw Review Committee

What is your prime focus?

I’d like to see Stockbridge focus on keeping our Town center dynamic. We will do this by supporting housing and economic development initiatives where most appropriate and by protecting our Town’s precious rural character.

What would you like to say to the voters?

We’ve seen a lot of pressure for large scale resort development. I think the most important issue with this is the question of scale. We see where some of our neighboring towns have lost sight of this. I don’t believe it’s improved their tax base or created affordable housing.

My professional life has been spent reading plans, so I feel well equipped for this work. Bylaw review is important, but the goal here is to maintain the character of the community. Stockbridge has always been a place where people want to visit, work, raise families, and become part of our long and distinguished history. I will work for these priorities. I promise that I will listen closely to the concerns and goals of the wonderful people who live here.

Jack Henderson, Planning Board

Carole:

Thanks for giving me this opportunity to reach out to all of my neighbors in Stockbridge. Can you be sure to add me to the mailing list for Stockbridge Updates and also let me know when the next issue will be out? If at any time you have any questions or issues you want to discuss, please feel free to contact me. Thanks. My answers to your questions are below.

Jack

What prompted you to run?

I retired in 2015 from a long career of planning and implementing major water and wastewater projects around the world which significantly improved millions of peoples lives. I now have the time and ability to focus this experience on improving the lives of the residents of Stockbridge while protecting the character of our community.

What is your prime focus?

I want to facilitate smart, reasonable development to broaden our tax base for all taxpayers. Smart, sensible development can achieve this while protecting the right of homeowners, property owners and business owners alike, as well as protecting what we all love about living in Stockbridge.

What would you like to say to the voters?

Over the course of my career, I have been involved in numerous heated public meetings with many opposing stakeholders with very different views and ideas on what development is sensible and what is not. I have learned how to explore all the different ideas and potential impacts of projects to be able to span most of these differences and reach a consensus on a reasonable plan to proceed with and implement. I believe I can bring this experience to the table to help the people of Stockbridge decide what is sensible development. I am always willing to listen, with an open mind, to any stakeholder’s ideas and/or concerns over any issue before the Planning Board to find, if possible, a consensus solution and can be reached at [deleted] Please feel free to contact me to discuss what’s on your mind.

Mark Mills, Planning Board

What prompted you to run?

As of the end of 2020 I retired from my career as a financial journalist. That has given me the time to offer to serve the community. By nature, I am a planner. I held the Certified Financial Planner designation for 20 years and co-authored a book on retirement planning for the Baby Boom generation.

What would be your prime focus (or the one thing you would like to accomplish during your term in office)?

Stockbridge has a number of older residents who are living on modest incomes. The Town should make efforts to help these folks remain in their homes. We should also try to attract younger families to Stockbridge with an eye toward creating a robust future, while also preserving the rural character of the town.

What would you like to say to voters?

My wife, Nancy, and I have been Stockbridge homeowners since 2002. We moved here full-time six years ago. We chose Stockbridge because it is a wonderful place to live. We have made some great friends here. I have been here long enough to feel a part of the Town. I would like to make a contribution to a place that I have come to love. We have three children and four grandchildren who greatly enjoy their visits. It’s a special place; I want to help preserve and nurture it.

Mark Faber, Tree Warden

What prompted you to run?

I want to help the Town, as my father did it when he was Tree Warden. I have the time, ability, and the knowledge.

What would be your prime focus (or the one thing you would like to accomplish during your term in office)?

Remove bad and dangerous trees, add more variety of trees, ones that can handle climate change.

What would you like to say to voters?

I am open to ideas and will work with everyone. I believe the Town is in good shape, I just want to keep it that way.

Hugh Page, Tree Warden

The statement below addresses your questions.

I believe that the 2 departments will work better together as one. This will speed up response time and improve time management. Using the resources of tree warden will aid in roadside projects, storm clean up, as well as preventive maintenance.

Thank you,

Hugh Page

Editor’s Note: Page is the current Highway Foreman running for Tree Warden. If he wins, he will hold both positions. Those are “the 2 departments” to which he refers.

News

Candidates for Office

The following candidates will appear on the ballot. Election Day is Tuesday, May 18,

Uncontested:

• Donald Schneyer, Water & Sewer Commissioner, incumbent
• Charles Kenny, Board of Health, incumbent
• James Welch, Housing Authority, incumbent
• Gary Pitney, Board of Assessors, incumbent
• Even though uncontested, vote for all candidates you support; the final vote count is important.

Contested:

• Gary Johnston, Moderator, incumbent
• Jamie Minacci, Moderator
• Mark Faber, Tree Warden
• Hugh Page, Tree Warden
• Ernest J. (Chuck) Cardillo, Select Board, incumbent
• Donald Chabon, Select Board
• (Planning Board—vote for two)
• Gary Pitney, Planning Board, incumbent
• Carl Sprague, Planning Board
• Mark Mills, Planning Board
• John M. Henderson, Planning Board

Stockbridge Democratic Town Committee

The Stockbridge Democratic Town Committee held a caucus on April 14th and endorsed the following candidates:

• Moderator: Jamie Minacci
• Select Board: Don Chabon
• Board of Assessors: Gary Pitney
• Board of Health: Dr. Charles Kenny
• Sewer & Water: Donald Schneyer
• Planning Board: Gary Pitney
• Planning Board: Carl Sprague

News

Another Award for Stockbridge

A panel of experts partnered with the “10 Best” editors to pick the initial nominees, and the top 10 winners were determined by popular vote. In the entire country, Stockbridge was named one of the ten best in the “Small Town Arts Scene” category. Congratulations!

Contributors

Should the Town of Stockbridge Adopt the Residential Tax Exemption?

Massachusetts offers a local option residential exemption that allows municipalities to apply a uniform exemption to property assessments of owner-occupied properties. The exemption does not reduce total tax revenue, and thus shifts property taxes from lower valued properties to higher valued properties that are not owner occupied. Given the increasing trend away from owner occupancy in Stockbridge, and the escalation of property values, this exemption might be a tool to help Stockbridge residents remain in their homes.

Sixteen towns and municipalities within the State have adopted this exemption. A number of them are located on Cape Cod where fulltime residents have faced similar taxation challenges as Stockbridge due to increasing numbers of seasonal residents and short-term rentals, driving up the assessments of all properties in town. Demographic indicators pertaining to income and to housing values in Stockbridge suggest median annual income of fulltime households to be below $50,000 (half above and half below), and median assessments for these houses to be close to $300,000. While the current tax rate remains relatively low at below $10/1,000, the increases in house assessments effectively raises taxes. The next few years will likely see a significant assessment raise.

Overall, house values in Town have an average assessment which may exceed $600,000. This precise amount would need to be certified by the Assessor. Under the Residential Tax Exemption, up to 35% of that number could be exempted. Therefore, with the exemption, those with lower home values could see a significant reduction in their tax bill in spite of an increase in the tax rate. The lower the assessed value, the greater the exemption’s impact (as a percentage of the home’s value). Higher valued owner-occupied houses would likely see a modest reduction in taxes. All seasonal, vacant, and rental houses would see an increase in their tax bill.

This is largely a progressive tax, meaning lower valued properties (and often lower income homeowners) would receive the most benefit. It is recommended that the Assessor’s office, under direction of the Assessment Board, model the impacts of the Exemption at different reduction amounts. This, in turn, would enable the Select Board (with public input) to set the tax rate. While this is just one tool among other exemptions, it can provide significant support to those struggling with housing stress.

by Jed Baumwell

Contributors

Stockbridge 2030? Part Two

by Larry Ackerman

Right now, job one is to paint a picture of how we’d like our town to look in the future — and to plan, accordingly. The Planning Board could lead a purposeful conversation about that future as it pertains to land use. What are our needs? Do we need another resort? A broader small-business commercial base? More housing that serves different groups (e.g., housing for the elderly, downsizers, young families)? The answers to these questions depend entirely on what we decide we want Stockbridge to stand for.

Let’s hammer out that vision, together. Only then will be in a position to make smart decisions about zoning and development. I’m sure that whatever is ultimately agreed to won’t meet all of my hopes, nor will they meet all of yours. But at least we’ll have a picture of what we can reasonably achieve and a good idea about why it’s worth achieving. Let’s be realistic in our expectations and not change just for the sake of change. There’s an expression that If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.

Nothing is black and white. It’s never helpful to claim that it’s my way or the highway. There’s no room for absolutism when the long-term health of our community is at stake. Which brings me back to Norman Rockwell.

Inside the nostalgia that characterizes Rockwell’s work lies a keen awareness of the human condition. Humor, fear, struggle, hope, friendship, courage, even diversity all show up in his art — all the things that make a community strong. Let’s tap into these realities as we move ahead.

Editor’s Note: If you want to put the pieces together, Part One ran in the May 1 issue of SU. You can find it by clicking here.

by Larry Ackerman

Contributors

The Soul of Stockbridge: Part One

It’s spring in Stockbridge. I’m walking down Main Street to open the “best little country store in the world.” It’s the perfect spring day, and I think about how much I love the tulips in front of the Red Lion Inn and the sound of the birds providing the soundtrack for my life.

Main Street is postcard perfect. I never tire of the view down the sidewalk on my morning commute. Of course, it’s just as beautiful in summer when absolutely everything is in bloom, and if you pay attention, the fragrance from the Red Lion lilies fills the air with aroma therapy. It’s even more engaging in autumn when there are leaves to crunch under my feet in front of St. Paul’s a reminder of sweet childhood memories walking to school. Perhaps the best season of all is when the town is covered in snow and it’s literally a work of art.

I arrive at the shop, coax my key into the finicky lock, and using the only technique that works to open the centuries old heavy door, maneuver the key until it turns, grasp the handle with my left hand, and push my hip into it. Thus I am welcomed in with the shop bell jangling above my head. I have the same thought every time: How many shopkeepers before me have performed this very same ritual, this very same way, morning after morning, for more than two centuries. I turn to look out the big front windows and see the patient dogwalker stopped near a tree on the sidewalk and then a neighbor from up the hill making [his or her? not their] way to the post office or coffee shop. Who was it my shopkeeper predecessors turned to see on Main Street? Maybe an unleashed dog sniffing along the shaded street. Maybe a neighbor scurrying in the shop behind them, come to town to purchase dry goods on credit with simply a name and a currency amount written on a small slip of crinkly paper. That’s how they did it. I’ve seen the evidence.

I perform the ritual of turning on the hidden light switches, count the starting money into the cash register and inhale the familiar mix of beeswax candles, sugary candy, pine soap and old wood. What used to be on these antique shelves – bolts of cotton? Hand forged nails and leather straps? Coffee and spices?

Editor’s note: Teresa’s commute is a few steps to the corner, across Main street, and four doors down.

by Teresa O'Brient

Contributors

Stockbridge History: Anna Bingham

from Massachusetts Court of General Sessions to the U.S. Supreme Court

by Rick Wilcox

September 1782, Court of General Sessions, P 182, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts against Anna Bingham. The Jurors for the Common wealth of Massachusetts for the body of said Berkshire on Their oath present that Anna Bingham of Stockbridge in said County Widow at said Stockbridge on the first day of January last past, with force and Arms unlawfully and wickedly did presume to keep a Tavern (now the Red Lion Inn), and did then and there sell Retail Rum, Wine & Brandy, being a species of Spirituous liquor unto one Caleb Wright and various other persons, without license first orderly had and obtained for the same, in evil example to others in like Case to offend & against peace, Authority & Dignity of the Common wealth of Massachusetts, and their Law in that case made and provided. Upon which presentment the said Anna being arraigned, and put to plead how she will discharge herself of the aforesaid Presentment, pleads and says, that She will not contend with the Common wealth — Wherefore it is considered by the Court, and thereupon by the said Court adjudged and determined that said Anna Bingham pay the sum of six pounds as a fine to be disposed of according to law, and the Costs of this prosecution Taxed at two pounds four schillings and six pence, and that she stand committed until performance of the sentence.

Bingham was the first woman to have a case (Kingsley Vs. Jenkins) heard in the U.S. Supreme Court. Anna a strong and ambitious woman and widow, had to fend for herself in a world where women were discouraged from exhibiting such characteristics. In the Supreme court case one Thomas Jenkins, an entrepreneur from Hudson New York loaned a number of depreciated securities to Ebenezer Kingsley, Silas Pepoon and Anna Bingham. When the securities were returned to Jenkins in 1790, he learned that Kingsley was insolvent. Jenkins sued in federal court and won. The decision was later upheld in the Supreme Court. Kingsley died in 1792 and Bingham and Pepoon not wanting to be saddled with that debt then sued Jenkins and lost. They obtained a writ of error in 1797 and went back to the Supreme Court, but the court upheld the earlier ruling. Although Bingham was the first woman to take a case to the Supreme Court, they twice ruled against her.

by Rick Wilcox

The Last Word

Reader to Reader — We Got Mail

Carole,

As chair of the Stockbridge Cultural Council, I was delighted to see your piece about this year’s awards. We are always looking for ways to get the word out; this was perfect.

Just need to clear up one minor point: we had the press release sent from Smitty Pignatelli’s office, (because he has a larger reach than we do), but he wasn’t part of the decision-making process. All the projects were chosen by Stockbridge Cultural Council members.

Again, many thanks for helping us remind Stockbridge that we’re here and giving out money!

Best,

Karen Marshall

Dear Karen,

Thank you for all you and your committee do and thank you for taking the time to write.

Carole

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

As we near the end of the school year, I want to thank the First Congregational Church of Stockbridge, the Shrine of The Divine Mercy and the Town of Stockbridge on behalf of the community of Berkshire Waldorf High School—students, parents, teachers, and members of our Board.

Our school has been able to hold classes in person for most of the year—with (so far) zero cases of COVID—because of the generosity of the Congregational Church, Pastor Brent Damrow, and Will Garrison, who welcomed us in to use their Meeting Room and Sanctuary as classroom spaces in order to maintain appropriate distance and ventilation. On any given day, half our students are in our school building on Pine Street, and half are at the Church. We simply couldn’t have operated as we have without the generosity of the Church.

And, in a year when the Class of 2020 didn’t know if they would be able to graduate in person, the Marion Fathers, particularly Father Kaz Chwalek and Father Anthony Gramlich, welcomed us to use the outdoor Shrine last August for our ceremony. And, for the Class of 2021, the Shrine is welcoming us again this June.

Balancing the requirements of safety, of education, and of institutional viability has been a challenge for the past year, and Berkshire Waldorf High School simply couldn’t have done it as well as we have without true partners in the Town of Stockbridge.

Many, many thanks, Steve

Dear Steve,

Thank you for bringing the joy of a school and the sound of children into Stockbridge once more.

Carole

Editor’s note: Stephen Keith Sagarin, PhD, is Executive Director & Faculty Chair at Berkshire Waldorf High School.

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

This is in response to [a news report] about the 4/22/21 Select Board Meeting in your Stockbridge Updates of 5/1/21.

I want to address the discussion on 4/22/21 in regard to the dredging that’s been proposed for the Stockbridge Bowl. It was stated by Greg Wellenkamp that the portion of the outlet south and west of the gas pipelines has not been affected by silt buildup and therefore does not need to be dredged. This is completely untrue. This area, also known as the Cove, has, in fact, been filled up with silt. When I first moved into my family’s home on the Cove, in the summer of 1965, this area was used by lots of kids as a swimming hole. There was a rope attached to a tree and local kids loved swinging on this rope and then jumping off into the cove. The Cove was deep and clean. Now this area is very shallow and filled with vegetation. How did this happen? Silt build up is the answer.

The Cove is an area that is still enjoyed by many for boating and fishing, but not swimming any more. If this area of the outlet is not addressed in the dredging plans, just as Michael Nathan has stated for the other part of the outlet, the southwest outlet and the Cove will become wetlands and untouchable. This will be a great loss for our quintessential New England small town. The Cove is beautiful, and its loss will be tragic. This gorgeous area must be included, as promised by the SBA, in your dredging plans.

Respectfully submitted,

Henry P. Schwerner, M.D.

Dear Henry,

Thank you for correcting the record and thanks for all you and Anita do for Stockbridge.

Carole

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

Stockbridge does not need fixing; it requires caring. Stockbridge is a gem of a community: So unique that people world-wide aspire to visit, often relocate, for its grace, solitude, safety, charm, beauty, history, and culture. My position was, and is to continue to protect, and care for what our predecessors have so graciously gifted us as a place to live a great life.

Gary Pitney

Dear Gary,

Thank you for your 15 years of service on Stockbridge Planning Board in addition to your service on the Board of Assessors. Those who quietly take on the work of this wonderful village, deserve our thanks.

Carole

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

Just a note to say how much I loved your editorial. Well done.

Thanks, Larry Ackerman

Dear Larry,

How nice to receive a compliment from a writer as good as you are.

Carole

* * ^ * *

Carole,

I wanted to thank you for your even-handed informative coverage of the upcoming Stockbridge Town Election. All know we are coming out of a difficult period in our Nation’s history and have learned that nothing is more important than accurate and reliable news. Our Town, like many, will be facing numerous challenges. Challenges that will require elected leaders who are on top of their game. And with good information our citizens can make intelligent choices at the poles on Tuesday May 18. The contribution of Stockbridge Updates is much appreciated. Keep up the good work.

Don Chabon

Candidate for Stockbridge Select Board

Dear Don.

Thank you for the kind words — much appreciated. And thank you for your years of service to Stockbridge.

Carole

* * ^ * *

The Last Word

Reader to Reader — Candidate Endorsements

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

We raised our 2 sons in town. My husband had his practice in town, and our family has participated in town events and committees for 40 years. I always thought Stockbridge led the pack in propriety and civility. Never have I encountered the disgraceful, and frankly frightening malevolence displayed by a single man as he unabashedly tries to disparage those who differ from his views with misleading and dishonest pamphlets and emails. Not only does he show complete disrespect for legitimate candidates and civil servants who have worked hard for this town, he repeatedly attempts to alienate them by stamping them as a “cabal” or “group of 16”, as though they had some evil plot to take over the town. This is Trumpian politics at its worst.

For the sake of democracy, vote for civility and decency: Gary Pitney and Carl Sprague.

Barbara Kenny

* * ^ * *

Elect Pitney and Sprague to Stockbridge Planning Board

With town elections nearing and four candidates running for two seats on the Planning Board, Stockbridge voters may want to reflect on what they value about living in our town. Our current zoning bylaws support the rural character of the town outskirts with a focused business district; this helps maintain property values, our healthy municipal finances, natural resources and scenic beauty. Our zoning has made Stockbridge a desirable place to live. Gary Pitney and Carl Sprague understand this.

Carl, as founder and chair of the Historic Preservation Committee, has saved many historic properties in recent decades. This work involves research, patience and diplomacy. He is also an artist who designs and builds movie sets. His understanding of the town and visual sensibility are critically important at this juncture if Stockbridge is to retain the qualities that make it unique. Carl is committed to preserving affordability for seniors and young people. Bringing the next generation into our planning process and expediting our meetings and discussions are important priorities.

Gary brings much needed experience, balance and moderation to the Planning Board. His work is characterized by civility, knowledge and respect for open process and applicable laws. When he was chair of the Planning Board, administrative matters were handled efficiently. His skillful use of tact and humor was invaluable.

Respect for the history of Stockbridge and its zoning is especially important now because a new zoning bylaw being drafted by the Planning Board with the claim that it will protect open space has major flaws. It leaves expansion of subdivision density on the outskirts to Planning Board discretion — a significant departure from current law that can lead to suburbanization, sprawl and higher taxes for everyone. We need experience and a visual sensibility on the Planning Board. You will find these qualities, and more, in Gary Pitney and Carl Sprague.

Kate Fletcher

* * ^ * *

Marking my Ballot for Mark Mills

Our community can kick and scream, but when federal and state courts make decisions, they change the way local decisions are made. One long-standing legal principle is that property owners have rights, including the right to develop their land.

Development must comply with laws and regulations to protect the town’s health and safety, but to think that somehow Stockbridge can “just say no” to development is foolhardy.

One person running for election to the Stockbridge Planning Board has demonstrated the ability to research best practices, analyze facts and make decisions on complex project applications. THAT PERSON IS MARK MILLS.

He understands smart growth principles and the importance of adopting zoning bylaws that will maintain the rural character of Stockbridge that we cherish. Mark is concerned that the town’s mostly two and four-acre zoning will lead to the construction of more million-dollar homes scattered across the countryside, mostly occupied by non-residents.

Mark favors zoning that will protect open space while providing a range of housing choices that can attract Berkshire-based families and provide options to local seniors who want to downsize but stay in Stockbridge.

Stockbridge has almost 100 parcels that are over twenty acres. What will happen to them? Stockbridge needs to channel future development in ways that benefit the town, not merely accept what the marketplace imposes on us. Mark understands the winning formula that we need, and that’s why I’m Mark(ing) my ballot for Mills.

Christine Rasmussen

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

Recent issues of Stockbridge Updates laid out candidates’ positions. Thank you! Here are my choices.

Don Chabon for Select Board.

I recommend Don’s website (https://donforstockbridge.godaddysites.com) to learn about his record as a past Selectman and to get a sense of his vision for the future. I have visited many political websites and Don’s is one of the most engaging. He bares his soul. Don is the right person for Select Board. He’s hard working, experienced, understands the need for transparency, open meeting laws, ethics, and Massachusetts General Laws. Don has the courage of his convictions and I respect his commitment.

Gary Pitney for Planning Board.

Gary has been an exemplary Planning Board Chair and Member. I believe one would be hard pressed to find residents who appeared before the Planning Board and left without admiration and gratitude that Gary listened wisely to their application and judged fairly. He was never arbitrary, frivolous, disrespectful, or mean-spirited.

I had the honor of sitting on the Planning Board when Gary was its Chair. He showed a deep sense of fairness to applicants, fellow Board members, and the public. Moreover, Gary treats our zoning bylaws with the respect they deserve. Like a good judge, he knows the law, is compassionate, listens attentively, and is thoughtful. Best of all, he is a gentleman. Explains his decisions and never decides from prejudice, ignorance, or a hidden agenda. His votes are based on the law.

Carl Sprague for Planning Board.

I first met Carl Sprague in 2013. As Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission, he conducted the meeting efficiently and dispassionately. Carl encouraged questions and made all feel welcome. Carl also made wise contributions to the Zoning Bylaw Review Committee. He has a passion for his hometown. As a professional art director and scenic designer, Carl would add aesthetic depth to the Planning Board. He is a gentleman who respects the opinions of others.

Jamie Minacci for Moderator.

Jamie chairs the Stockbridge Bowl Stewardship Committee and serves on the Conservation Committee. Jamie wants to engage more people, especially younger people, in town government. She has been active on the Stockbridge Town Democratic Committee where she was elected Secretary. Jamie cares deeply about our lack of affordable housing, inadequate housing for seniors, and the Berkshire Hills Regional School District where her children attended. As Moderator, Jamie will treat everyone equally and grant them equal opportunity to speak at Town Meeting. If she wins, she’s determined to reach out and find qualified Stockbridge women to appoint to the Finance Committee.

May 18 is election day. Don’t be silent – VOTE!

Barney Edmonds

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

“Blue Ears,” the tagged Stockbridge bear, paid us a visit recently on Rattlesnake Mountain.

In the spirit of the “Rattlesnake Gang,” I got out our BB gun and let him have it. I got him once in his front leg and once in the butt as he was retreating. He won’t come back. Why do I know this? Bears have really good memories and if they find a place inhospitable to them, they stay away from that place.

Well, speaking of memories (and they say us Yankees, AKA “woodchucks,” have good memories): I recall, quite vividly, an episode where a good friend of mine was being, sort of, harassed by a relatively new neighbor to remove his 40-plus years permitted business from its headquarters off a road here in Stockbridge. It was an issue about operating a business in a residential zone in town. Well, long tale short, my friend won out because he had a permit to use his property to operate the business.

What my memory brings back so vividly is that during the hearing before the Stockbridge Zoning Board of Appeals, I couldn’t contain myself and got up to speak. I addressed the person making the complaint and said, “We live here, too, and have for a long time. We have seen new folks moving into our town because they think what we have preserved is so wonderful. That’s fine, we like it, too, as is, but our problem is that you move here and try and change here into where you came from. That just doesn’t fly and never will.”

Why do I bring this to the table now? That same person who harassed my friend and made him spend unnecessary dollars on a lawyer is running for Planning Board in Stockbridge. Make your own decision when it comes to the vote. I have. I am voting for Carl Sprague, Gary Pitney and Don Chabon.

John Hart

Dear John,

There is only one John Hart, and hopefully only one Blue Ears.

Carole

* * ^ * *

Dear Carole,

I am voting for Don Chabon for Stockbridge Select Board.

Don Chabon has been an active member of our Stockbridge town in different ways for many years, chairing the Democratic committee, serving on the Selectboard, and the Planning Board. We are giving him our support for selectman of Stockbridge. Please consider voting for Don.

All those who serve our town in positions have my respect. I served for 15 years on the Parks and Recs Committee. These positions can sometimes be thankless and take many hours to perform the required duties; however, our town cannot run without folks being ready and willing to participate.

Don is thoughtful, smart, and his judgment is almost always spot on. Being a selectman means making some very difficult decisions at times. Don gives much thought and consideration to these decisions. He actively seeks town people’s opinions and will make choices based on what is best for our town. He understands the issues facing our town around growth and expansion and keeping our town fiscally strong.

Please give your vote to Don Chabon for Stockbridge Selectman on May 18.

Mary Hart

Dear Mary,

Thank you for your submission, and for your decades of service to Town of Stockbridge.

Carole