The evidentiary portion of the Public Hearing was closed, and the balance of the hearing was continued until April 9, 2026. That means that on April 9th all there is left to do is for the SB to deliberate and vote. The applicant will not present any further testimony and no comments from the public will be entertained. The SB will deliberate and vote.

The major unresolved issue addressed by the SB was the number of homes to be built. The applicant made clear that 38 is the number they need to generate the income to restore Elm Court, and the gardens, The board was divided as follows: Chuck Cardillo was okay with the 38 homes; Jamie favored 28, and Jorja 19. The SB mentioned other conditions that might attach.

Comments from the floor were fewer in favor and fewer from Stockbridge – more from Lenox and more apposed. However, seemingly all wanted Elm Court restored.

Editor’s note: Point of personal privilege: Many folks know I am supportive of historic restoration and opposed to density. What was suggested was that the 38 houses (which increases density) were necessary to pay for the restoration of Elm Court. They said fewer houses allowed would render the project not viable. That is a hard choice and the heart of the matter. It is also a difficult problem to solve.